The Lowa Renegade II GTX Lo
is made with a Nubuck leather upper, a polyurethane midsole, a waterproof Gore-Tex liner, and Vibram's Renovo sole.
These classic hiking shoes are durable and waterproof, but could stand to have a little more cushion underfoot.
The chart below shows how the Renegades
compared to the other shoes in our review.
This the only shoe in our review that uses a polyurethane midsole (Lowa's
"DuraPU with Monowrap Frame). Lowa
states that a polyurethane sole is "a terrific shock absorber and longer lasting than the more common EVA midsole." While we agree that it is probably longer lasting, this shoe feels like it has little to no cushioning to it, and we noticed a distinct lack of shock absorption particularly compared to some of the dual-density EVA midsoles, like the one on the Oboz Sawtooth Low BDry
. They also state that polyurethane involves a cleaner manufacturing process than EVA. While we can neither confirm nor deny that, there is something to be said about buying one pair of shoes that lasts for five years as opposed to a new pair every year. But if you never even want to wear them because they are so uncomfortable, then what is the point? Only the Asolo Outlaw GV - Women's
scored lower than this model comfort-wise and that was because it had little cushioning and also had a slippery footbed which made our feet slide around in that shoe and get hot spots.
The sole and midsole on this shoe are incredibly stiff, so while we couldn't feel the sharp rocks underfoot, we didn't feel any cushioning either.
This shoe almost made up for its lack of comfort in our support metric. It provided some of the best support in our review, thanks to the stiff sole which gave us great lateral support, as well as the internal and external arch support. We did a hike in these shoes with a 30 pound pack on, and it gave us enough support even over rocky and unstable terrain.
The external rubber arch on both sides of the Lowas provide a lot of lateral support, and the stiff sole made traversing a rock slab a breeze.
This shoe had surprisingly good traction for such a stiff sole. Sometimes a stiff sole does not bend enough to create the friction needed to stick on steep surfaces, but the rubber lugs on this sole are soft and flexible enough to help overcome that. Whether on a loose dirt trail or steep rock slap, we felt really confident in the tread and traction the Vibram Renovo sole gave us.
We couldn't get as much flexion in the forefoot as some other shoes, but the rubber is sticky enough to help overcome that.
This was the heaviest shoe in the test pack, at 2 lbs 2 oz in the women's size 10 that we tested. That's 9 ounces more than the Ahnu Sugarpine WP - Women's
, about half pound, which may not seem like much but does add up over countless steps. While this shoe is still much lighter than a full boot or the heavy hiking shoes of old, lighter is still better as long as it can provide the comfort and support we need.
These shoes even look heavy! All that leather and thick rubber adds up.
We didn't have to worry when hiking up a stream to access a remote canyon. These shoes are completely waterproof - but water can still get in from the top so beware!
The Gore-tex liner and Nubuck leather upper did a great job of keeping our feet dry during our bucket test. There was little saturation of the leather, which is good from a weight perspective, but the shoe is a little lower cut around the ankle than the Oboz
and Hoka One One
models, which means that there is slightly less coverage available when crossing streams or walking through wet brush.
Water rolls right off the leather upper. You're more likely to get wet feet from water coming in from the ankle than the shoe itself.
While no shoe will last forever, this pair could come close. The rubber sole wraps all the way around the shoe, with no exposed midsole, which is one of the first places to deteriorate when hiking through rugged terrain. The rubber toe cap will also help protect the shoe from those with sloppy footwork. While researching online user reviews of this shoe we found little durability complaints as well.
The rubber toe cap extends completely around the shoe, making this shoe highly durable. There is no exposed soft midsole, and the seams on the upper are all double stitched.
If you are hiking in rugged terrain and want a shoe that can last for several seasons, the Renegades
are a good choice as long as you don't mind a stiff and uncomfortable footbed.
Contemplating the hike out in the Lowa's. While this shoe is supportive enough to be worn with heavy pack, we wished for our feet and knees sake that there was a little more cushioning as well.
These shoes cost $210, which is significantly more than most other pairs in this review and twice the price of our Best Buy winner, the Merrell Moab 2 Ventilator - Women's
. Are they worth it? While it's better to buy a quality pair that can last a few seasons rather than a new pair every year, considering the Lowa Renegade II GTX Lo's
lack of comfort, it seems a "stiff" price to pay.
The Lowa Renegade II GTX Lo
is a beast of a shoe, but not a comfortable one. While you could put a cushier insole in there to provide some extra comfort, since you're already paying significantly more for this model than any other one in this review it's hard to justify any additional expense.
makes a variety of shoes in the Renegade
line, including low cut Renegade
and Renegade III
models. They are all around the same price point, with the III being the lightest model and the original the heaviest. We also tested the Lowa Renegade GTX Mid - Women's
($230) in our hiking boot review and it was our Top Pick award winner for Durability.