Reviews You Can Rely On

Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 Review

While these binoculars are good, many competitors in the same price range are better
gearlab tested logo
celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 binocular review
Showing all of the accessories included with the Trailseeker.
Credit: Max Mutter
Price:  $390 List
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   Celestron
By Max Mutter ⋅ Senior Review Editor  ⋅  Dec 7, 2022
70
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Clarity - 45% 5.8
  • Brightness - 25% 8.1
  • Comfort - 10% 7.0
  • Field of View - 10% 9.0
  • Ease of Adjustment - 5% 8.0
  • Close Focus Range - 5% 8.0

Our Verdict

In our opinion, the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 is a good but not great pair of binoculars. Considering their price range, they provide a fairly good optical experience and are well made. The problem comes with the fact that we put them up against the best binoculars. We've found multiple pairs of binos priced very similarly that are noticeably clearer and brighter. If you already have a pair of these binoculars or manage to find them heavily discounted, we think the quality is more than good enough to stoke a budding bird-watching hobby. However, if you're starting from scratch and paying retail prices, your money can likely go substantially further elsewhere.
REASONS TO BUY
Relatively good clarity
Easy to focus
REASONS TO AVOID
Fairly dim
Rubber feels a bit sticky
Editor's Note: This review of the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 was updated on December 7th, 2022. We retested this binocular and updated all the relevant information.

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 is one of many binoculars with good optical quality and decent construction but falls short of other similarly priced models. This is a common plight in this very competitive price range.

Performance Comparison


celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 binocular review - the field of view on the celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 was excellent.
The field of view on the Celestron Trailseeker ED 8x42 was excellent.
Credit: Max Mutter

Clarity


We'd classify the clarity of the TrailSeeker ED 8x42 as above average but not fantastic, a perennial B that gets outshined by a handful of straight-A students.

The images produced by the TrailSeeker ED 8x42 are quite good, with minor details looking relatively clear. However, when compared side-by-side with those of some other similarly priced models, it's apparent that these binos miss some of the minor details. Tufts of feathers can lose some of their definition, dense foliage can get a bit muddled at a distance, and blades of grass can blend together. Also, the images start to lose some clarity about midway between the center and the edge of the frame. The difference is minor, but this makes the image feel a bit flatter and less immersive. Other models in this price range manage to create a more 3D-feeling image that draws you in more.

celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 binocular review - these binoculars produce good images, but they lack a bit of clarity...
These binoculars produce good images, but they lack a bit of clarity and brightness when compared to some of their main competitors.
Credit: Max Mutter

While we've mostly been nitpicking the downsides of the TrailSeeker ED 8x42's clarity, it isn't all that bad; it just doesn't stand out in a crowd. We don't think anyone will be disappointed with the clarity; it's just possible to get something better for the same retail price.

Brightness


The TrailSeeker ED 8x42's brightness is quite good but again falls short of some of its competitors. In most situations, this model provides a very bright image. Even in the shade, it offers enough brightness to make out subtle color differences. Low light situations, like early dawn and late dusk, are where it starts to struggle. In such instances, its images turn into silhouettes significantly earlier than some of its main rivals. If you tend to be birdwatching when the light gets low, these may not be the bins for you.

celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 binocular review - the glass in these binoculars is good, but not best of class.
The glass in these binoculars is good, but not best of class.
Credit: Max Mutter

Comfort


Overall the TrailSeeker ED 8x42 is quite comfortable to hold, but the lack of features holds it back. This model is generally the right size and shape for comfortable holding--our hands didn't get overly fatigued when using them for multiple hours. However, thumb indents on the bottom of the barrels would make them significantly more ergonomic. Additionally, the rubber feels slightly sticky. Particularly on hot days, this can feel a bit odd.

celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 binocular review - we wish these bins had some thumb indents, but they're not terribly...
We wish these bins had some thumb indents, but they're not terribly uncomfortable to hold.
Credit: Max Mutter

Field of View


The manufacturer-stated field of view of 426 feet at 1000 yards is one of the best in its class, however, in testing conditions we recorded a measurement of 373 feet. However, it doesn't beat its competitors by a wide enough margin to be especially noticeable in normal use.

celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 binocular review - showing all of the accessories included with the trailseeker.
Showing all of the accessories included with the Trailseeker.
Credit: Max Mutter

Ease of Adjustment


We had no major complaints when adjusting the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42. The focus knob is supple, and the diopter budges when you want it to and stays put when you don't. Some of the more expensive models sport focus knobs that feel a bit more fine-tuned, but overall we don't think anyone will have trouble adjusting these bins.

celestron trailseeker ed 8x42 binocular review - we had no complaints with the focus nor diopter adjustemnts.
We had no complaints with the focus nor diopter adjustemnts.
Credit: Max Mutter

Close Focus Range


The Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42's manufacturer-stated close focus range is 6.5 feet. This is close enough that you'll likely be able to get even close-by insects in focus. Some other models allow you to get even your own toes in focus, but these binoculars fall short of that mark.

Accessories


While we don't usually talk about binocular accessories because of the near-identical group of neck-straps and carrying cases on offer, the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 throws a unique bonus item into the mix. The double shoulder strap that comes in the box both holds the binoculars more securely on your body than a standard neck strap and gives you something to lean against when you raise the binoculars to your eyes. If adjusted correctly, leaning against the straps can reduce hand shake significantly. Particularly for the coffee addicts amongst us, this can vastly improve the overall quality of the image. Our one complaint with these straps is the large footprint they present on your back, which can get in the way of hoods and whatnot. However, they are low profile and fit well under most backpacks.

The double shoulder strap is a very useful extra accessory.
The double shoulder strap is a very useful extra accessory.
The large back support provides nice support, but can potentially...
The large back support provides nice support, but can potentially get in the way of hoods or clothing.

Should You Buy the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42?


While the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 performs relatively well and doesn't cost all that much in the grand scheme of things, other models cost the same and offer noticeably better performance. For this reason, it missed out on an award and wouldn't be our top recommendation for anyone buying a new pair of bins at retail price.

What Other Binoculars Should You Consider?


The Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 offers a good overall experience but just doesn't stand out in an overly competitive field. For a top-notch user experience, we recommend the Vortex Viper HD 8x42, which offers performance on par with pairs that cost much more, such as the Swarovski EL 8.5x42. We also love the more affordable Vortex Diamondback HD 8x42, which uses the same HD glass as the Viper for a fraction of the cost.

Max Mutter